Let’s face it: the more content you create, the harder it is for your audience to find your most relevant work.
So why not help them zero in on the blog posts, tweets, photos and videos that you (or others) consider to be your most valuable?
When your various channels are united, you increase your chances of…
- meeting interesting people
- discovering useful information
- streamlining your personal brand
- saving yourself time
And the best part is, you don’t have to do anything more than what you’re already doing; you just have to do it smarter.
5 Ways to Boost Your Own Relevance (by Repurposing Your Own Content)
1. Offer Your Own “Best Of” List of Top Posts.
Some of your blog posts are better than others. Those are the ones you want new readers to find most easily.
So group them together.
Amber Naslund recently summarized her own best work on Altitude Branding, so her visitors won’t have to hunt through volumes of information to find her posts about marketing, blogging and beyond.
In that same manner, I’ve selected an array of my own leading posts about everything from social media and philosophy to freelance and pop culture. I’ve grouped them all together on one page, which gives readers a shortcut to my strengths and an overview of the subject matter I routinely discuss. (If you’re reading this post on my website, that snazzy new orange word balloon in my sidebar leads to the same place.)
2. Keep Your Channels Where I Can See Them.
How many profiles do you think you’ve created across your various social media channels?
10? 20? 50?
Are people aware that all of your profiles exist?
If not, what might happen if they did?
No matter how I stumble across you, I should easily be able to find all of your other active and relevant content channels.
Thus, if I like your photos on Flickr, I should be one or two clicks away from your Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn accounts at all times.
And your blog. And your Etsy store. And anything else about you that I might find interesting.
(Hint: Don’t worry about what I might find interesting. Simply provide as many ways to find you as you feel comfortable divulging, and then let me decide how much of you I want to remember.)
3. Find Ways to Make One Type of Content Interesting for Various Audiences.
Video is not audio is not photo is not blog.
But it can be.
For example, when you’re shooting a video for YouTube, have someone else take photographs documenting the making-of. Then post those photos to Flickr, and link to the finished video from the text description of each photograph. And then do the same in reverse.
This way, regardless of which direction your audience enters the story from, they’ll have a means to see it through. And by seeing slightly different facets of the same subject matter, they’ll have a richer understanding of the whole.
(Tip: If you use Viddler*, you can embed contextual links to photos, blog posts, etc., within the video itself.)
4. Reference Yourself When Applicable.
Odds are, you’ve written or spoken about your topic of the day numerous times before — and the odds are equally good that whoever’s reading today’s post or watching today’s video has no idea what you said last time.
Link to your own previous work within your newer blog posts. If you revisit themes, point to the blog posts that led to them. Include plugins (like the one I use below) to direct readers to “possibly relevant posts” within your own archives.
Likewise, link to your own previous videos within your newer work. Include onscreen titles (or embedded links) directing the audience to your other clips, and mention those clips via text links in your video’s description. No matter what spoke your audience first finds on that topical wheel, they should be able to reach all of the others from any starting point.
And So On And So Forth…
Yes, finding creative ways to cross-promote your channels can be time consuming. But once it becomes a habit, you’ll spend less time finding ways to be individually interesting across multiple platforms and more time being contextually relevant in perpetuity.
And the more aware people are of the vast entirety of who you are and what you do, the more opportunities they have to care.
* CORRECTION: I’d originally cited Vimeo as the video platform with contextual embedding; I meant Viddler. Sometimes, I get my “v”-christened video platforms confused. (Hi, Veoh.) While were at it, Blip is wonderful too, but they don’t start with a v.
Dig this blog? Subscribe and you’ll never miss a witty insight again.
Tags: audience, Blogging, branding, Business, common sense, networking, perception, Social Media
… because if I talk about social media for five days a week, I’ll have to start drinking.
Hark, a Meme
As much as I advocate creating content that matters, I also appreciate the genuinely absurd and escapist.
And the Internet is nothing if not absurd and escapist.
Especially Tumblr.
Perhaps the perfect example of the way the Internet works can be summed up with one Tumblr blog in particular:
It is what it says: a series of images in which actor Tom Selleck, a waterfall and a sandwich are Photoshopped together.
Why? Who cares; it just is.
And, like anything worth talking about on the web, it became immediately polarizing: some people (like these commenters) think it’s a horrifying waste of time and effort. Others find it vaguely amusing, whimsically postmodern or generally harmless. And some people just can’t enjoy a good meme without overanalyzing what the whole thing means.
Me, I love it for two reasons: its stark lack of context is refreshingly liberating, and its formulaic simplicity seems like it was purposely designed to engender crowdsourced knock-offs.
Like Bea Arthur Mountains Pizza.
Honestly, I have no idea whether BAMP is an homage to SWS or if BAMP and SWS were created by the same person. Its provenance is almost beside the point; either way, the existence of a derivative validates Selleck Waterfall Sandwich as a meme-worthy concept:
Celebrity. Location. Food.
Which prompted me, almost entirely by accident, to co-create Tony Danza Space Pretzel.
See, two of my “real-life” friends — Tom (AKA Locobone) and Maya — knew about Selleck Waterfall Sandwich before I did. So when I stumbled across Bea Arthur Mountains Pizza, I emailed them a link because I knew they’d appreciate it.
I also included a rhetorical question: “Is TonyDanzaSpacePizza taken?”
A few hours later, I return to my email to discover that each of them had, independently and without provocation, created a Tony Danza Space Pretzel image as a joke and mailed them back to me.
Taking this as a sign, I launched our Tumblr blog and the rest is (extremely recent) history. (Like, yesterday.)
Does it matter? Of course not.
And boy, is that a welcome change of pace.
If you’d like to create your own Tony Danza Space Pretzel image, feel free. Spread the word. Email your images to us and, if we like them, maybe we’ll add them to the blog.
No guarantees, no pressure. Just a creative outlet, borne from someone else’s unintentional (?) stroke of minimalist postmodern genius.
Thank you, Internet.
Tags: art, audience, bullshit, meme, perception, personal, pop culture, Social Media, Sociology, tonydanzaspacepretzel, tumblr
There was a small tsunami on Twitter yesterday that had nothing to do with Chilean earthquakes and everything to do with Chris Brogan’s wallet. In a nutshell, Brogan stated (somewhat quietly) that he charges $22,000 for a day of his time, and THE INTERNET EXPLODED IN A BALL OF SPITE.
Responses from the Twitterverse ranged from awe to derision.
Some people were mystified that one man could charge so much for what they consider to be so little work. Others immediately began scheming to calculate how they could escalate their own rates into the $20K per day range, because if there’s one thing social media loves, it’s imitation.
Personally, I see the public’s collective recoil as proof that no one truly believes anybody can make money online without first selling their soul to an affiliate program. Any evidence to the contrary simply blows our synapses.
But lost in this mix of sticker shock and vitriol were some key truths, which Chris touched on in a follow-up blog post, including:
- Chris doesn’t always work for a full day, so he doesn’t always bill for a full day.
- Chris gives away huge amounts of his own knowledge for free on a daily basis.
- Chris purposely prices himself in a range that discourages half-assed clients.
In short, Chris doesn’t always expect to make $22,000 a day, but he certainly doesn’t turn it down either.
And why should he?
Chris knows a thing or two about the Internet. He speaks and writes in a manner that people enjoy. And he brings a unique mix of personality, experience and analysis to the table, which enables him to price his services as a luxury rather than a commodity.
If a company were to pay Chris $22K, and then they turned around and invested his insights to the tune of $22M in profit, we’d all agree that the company had made a shrewd investment.
So why are we so aghast at the fact that these numbers exist?
Because none of us thought they were plausible — at least, not for us.
Fear and Loathing in Social Media
Let’s face it: you have no idea what you actually know about social media, and you certainly don’t know if you know more than the next girl. The only thing you’re sure of is that you know something, and you never really know what that something is actually worth.
Then Chris Brogan comes along and tells you what he believes he’s worth, and you panic because you never would have assigned that kind of value to yourself.
Why not?
Probably because you don’t believe your insights are worth $22,000 to anybody, much less for a single day of your time. Hell, you barely have any practical social media (or marketing, or business) experience to begin with. You have 400 Twitter followers and you wet yourself every time you get retweeted; $22,000 is like space money in your world.
So here’s a tip: stop hating Chris, stop hating yourself, and stop hating the newly-distinguished class separation between you. It is what it is, and resenting the successes of others sure as hell doesn’t vindicate your own lack thereof.
Yes, when it comes to the group hug that is social media, we’re “all in this together.” But some of us are waaaaaaaaaay more “in this” than others. Some of us really are worth a few hundred dollars a day, or a few thousand, or a day rate that far exceeds whatever you spent on your five years (and counting) of community college. So relax.
But this doesn’t mean that you’re worth nothing, either.
So how do you find the happy medium?
Here are 6 tips to help you stomach the reality of determining your own self-worth.
1. Admit what you do and don’t actually know.
This is the hardest part because human beings are horrible at honest self-evaluations. But, what the hell: try.
Sure, you don’t know everything about social media (or whatever field you’re in), but you do know something. Identify your areas of expertise. Are you strong on the social side but weak on the tech? Can you manage an existing strategy but not implement one from scratch? Are you a LinkedIn wizard and a Facebook rube?
Summarize your strengths and weaknesses. That way, when someone asks, “So, what do you have to offer?” you’ll have an answer that doesn’t involve lies, borrowed anecdotes and desperate obfuscations.
2. How much experience do you have… and with whom?
If you just started tweeting yesterday, your insights are not worth $22, much less $22,000. We’re all in competition with each other, and since our competing knowledge is always The Great Unknown, our work experience becomes a concrete qualifier that separates the know-hows from the guess-hows.
Who have you worked with? What did you do for them? How successful were you? What did you learn in the process?
What proof of your ability to make someone else’s business more profitable and efficient can you provide?
(Hint: If you’re stretching the truth to answer this question, cut your rates in half and remove the word “thought leader” from your Twitter bio.)
3. How hard are you willing to work?
You may not have astounding insights or jaw-dropping work experience, but there’s one intangible that can’t be ignored: you’ll work your ass off in order to get the job done. Any job. Multiple jobs, if necessary. You’re dedicated to success and you’ll work day and night to achieve the desired results.
When you put it like that, I can see why your rates may be higher than your contemporaries: because your clients know they can rely on you. Or take advantage of you. Or both. But however it shakes out, you’ll know you did your best — and you’ll charge for it.
4. How hard do you want to work?
We could all be busting our asses for 60 hours a week and changing the world left and right, but life is short and we’re tired, selfish, American Idol-addicted individuals. We’re fragile; we need breaks.
So we price ourselves higher than we need to because we want to work less than we have to.
Chris Brogan doesn’t want to work 60 hour weeks. At his rates, he doesn’t need to; he just needs 2 or 3 clients a month to meet him halfway and he’d be living quite comfortably.
5. Price yourself into the ballpark of the clientele you can best serve.
Chris Brogan’s rates mean his clients are self-selecting. He doesn’t want to spin his wheels with companies who aren’t capable of asking $22,000 questions, because he can’t provide those companies with the kinds of answers that will send his CV into the stratosphere.
But there’s a catch: at those rates, people expect results. They’re hiring a miracle worker, or renting time with an exotic shaman. If you can’t provide the kinds of insights that make your client’s competitors envious of your relationship, you have no business pricing yourself in that range.
All the same, if you price yourself too low, no one will hire you. People pay for the illusion of success, and if your rates say “will work for food,” you’ll starve to death. It’s fine to work for charity, but don’t price yourself like one or you’ll need their help to feed your family.
6. Everything you do is worth something; charge accordingly.
Stepping away from Chris Brogan for a moment, there’s another social media guru you can compare your rates to: Mack Collier.
Here’s a guy who unabashedly lists his price range for a wide array of services, from original content creation to audits of your existing social media strategy. Notice that his prices truly are a range, in both his actual rates and in the type of work he does. No matter what kinds of client Mack attracts, he offers “something for everyone” — which means he’s also likely to remain consistently employed.
What types of services can you offer? Can those services be bundled? Is there a sliding scale based on time constraints and degree of difficulty?
Even the priciest retailers have a bargain bin, because they don’t want anyone to leave without buying something.
A Final Word on Not Crying Yourself to Sleep in the Corner
No, you’re not Chris Brogan. Nor are you a person who earns even more than Chris Brogan does. (Yes, they’re out there, and if you knew what they charged, your bladder would never recover.)
Valuing yourself according to other people’s self-estimations is the easiest way to drive yourself crazy. But valuing yourself according to your own self-estimation is the easiest way to go hungry, because you never truly understand what your assets are actually worth to the people who don’t know what you know.
You wouldn’t pay somebody $5 to change your oil because you know how to do it yourself; I don’t, so I’m willing to pay $30 if it gets done fast and well.
Is your knowledge worth $30 to someone who doesn’t know what you know?
Is it worth $300? $3,000? $30,000?
The sky’s the limit, as long as you bring your own plane.
But if someone ends up paying you $30,000 to do nothing, they’re going to have to pay Chris Brogan a hell of a lot more than $30,000 to fix it — and then we’ll really start feeling some sticker shock.
Dig this blog? Subscribe and you’ll never miss a witty insight again.
Tags: bullshit, Business, chrisbrogan, common sense, expert, Freelance, honesty, money, perception, Social Media, Sociology, Twitter







