Yesterday, for my daily #1004question, I asked my Twitter followers:

If you had to give up Twitter or Facebook, which one could you live without?

The results surprised me.

Of the 26 people who responded on Twitter:

  • 20 said they’d give up Facebook.
  • 3 said they’d give up Twitter.
  • 3 said they’d give up both.

So… that’s interesting.  And incredibly lopsided.  I figured the results would be mixed, with a slight favoritism shown for one service over the other… but not a 7 to 1 differential.

(By that rationale, maybe Twitter is the service that should have filed for a $5 billion IPO last week, not Facebook…)

But wait…

What if my Twitter audience is biased towards Twitter simply because they’re on Twitter?

Curious to see if Twitter was really that much more beloved of a service than Facebook, I asked the same question on Facebook.  And, of the 11 people who responded on Facebook:

  • 8 said they’d give up Twitter.
  • 2 said they’d give up Facebook.
  • 1 said they’d give up both.

Or, in other words…

  • 77% of Twitter respondents said they’d prefer to give up Facebook.
  • 73% of Facebook respondents said they’d prefer to give up Twitter.

Granted, these are small sample sizes, so it’s impossible to draw sweeping conclusions.  But in both cases, the trend seems pretty consistent: people tend to love the service they’re on more than the service they’re not on at the moment.

But notice something about the response data:

  • I have 6300 Twitter followers, and 26 of them responded to this question.
  • I have 402 Facebook followers, and 11 of them responded.*

That’s means only 0.4% of my Twitter followers responded to me (even though I asked twice), versus 2.7% of my Facebook friends responding to me (even though I only asked once).  You can chalk that up to Facebook being a far more efficient way to communicate among a smaller group of people, or having a better information-sharing design, but either way you slice it, Facebook was 7 times more effective in generating a response to this question, even though the sampling pool was smaller to begin with.

For me, the real interesting info is the reasons why people would quit each service.

The people who say they’d prefer to quit Facebook said things like…

  • “Twitter gives you the unexpected”
  • “Twitter, for me, is about having reach.”
  • “Twitter has a good 30 IQ points on Facebook.”
  • “There are other ways to see photos of people, which is why I use FB at all.”
  • “Quality of connections I made on Twitter are far, far better than on FB.”
  • “Some people I’m ‘friends’ with on FB are [only] out of obligation.”
  • “Facebook is a cesspool, the Mos Eisley of social media.”

… whereas the people who say they’d prefer to quit Twitter said things like…

  • “I’ve had more relationships built via FB than Twitter.”
  • “Too many IRL friends here on Facebook to walk away.”
  • “Most of my Twitter followers really add nothing to my business.”
  • “The quality of conversation is much better on FB; Twitter is nothing more than a time-suck.”

All of which means that the Twitter lovers think they find smarter and more interesting / relevant conversations on Twitter, while the Facebook lovers believe the exact same thing about Facebook.

Or, as my friend Anthony summarized it from the available responses:

“If I leave Twitter, I’ll miss something!” vs. “If I leave Facebook, I’ll be missed!”

Ultimately, it seems that your love of each service boils down to your reason for using it: do you yearn to learn, or ache to be loved?

(And, how does this affect the way companies may want to tailor their social marketing to each audience?  Should they be more informative on Twitter but more emotional on Facebook, perhaps?  And do either of those options seem like an unwanted invasion of your online experience?)

Maybe in five years someone will have done a comprehensive study that proves Twitter is from Mars and Facebook is from Venus.  Or vice versa.  Or maybe both of these services will cease to exist in five years, and we’ll all be anachronistically calling each other on rotary phones to meet for drinks.

Either way, one thing’s certain: no matter what series of tubes we use to talk to each other, we’re all still desperate for ever more meaningful conversations.

And hugs.

* Actually, 13 of my Facebook friends responded to this question, not 11.  But my friend Sarah only responded to say “If you take away Pinterest, I’ll kick you,” to which another friend added, “I’d take away Pinterest just to watch Sarah kick you.”  So, Pinterest investors, take note: you, too, are well on your way to your own $5 billion IPO someday… one withdrawal-fueled shin-kick at a time.

Dig this blog? Subscribe and never miss a post. (Got email? Get my newsletter, too.)

Be Sociable, Share!

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/observacious Kim Z

    As for the response rate, I tend to view Twitter as a “now” thing. I rarely go back to what’s been posted an hour or more ago; whereas, when I use Facebook I’m likely to see stuff from even a week or more ago. Case in point, I wasn’t on Twitter much yesterday and didn’t see either of your queries.

    For the record, I would more like quit Facebook. I mostly use it to share the occasional kid photos. Also, some friends us that as their primary party invite service. Overall I view the systems like the old joke: “Facebook is the people you went to school with. Twitter is the people you wish you went to school with.” I think a lot of this is because on Twitter I pick people to follow because they are interesting, whether I know them IRL or not. On the other hand, there are often feelings of obligation to be friends with people on Facebook because I’ve known them in the past even if I have nothing in common now. (For this reason, Facebook can also become of hotbed of political discordance. I specifically avoid it on days when divisive issues are likely to be in the forefront.)

    I’d be more excited to meet some of the Tweeple in real life than to hang out with high school “friends” on FB.

  • Jennifer

    Since my account is locked on twitter and you don’t follow me, you wouldn’t see my response (@3weasels, wife of scottsweep). Locked accounts probably wouldn’t explain a huge difference in response rate, but it could be a contributing factor.

    Twitter is the for the people I see on a regular basis and the people who live outside Pittsburgh who I would like to know. Facebook is old friends (high school, college, old co-workers) that I want to stay in touch with but not “talk” to them everyday.

    Twitter is for real time conversations; Facebook is for telling people what you did.

  • http://www.3hatscommunications.com/blog/ davinabrewer

    Think it really does boil down to different strokes. I’d give up FB first b/c I use Twitter as a professional network, that takes priority. And since I’m not a heavy FB user, I could 1) keep up w/ my close friends anyway, via such crazy things as texts, calls, email and 2) live w/out picture updates and promo posts from HS friends and ‘liked’ pages. FWIW.