Whenever friends from Pittsburgh ask me how I’m adapting to Baltimore, I tell them the truth: Baltimore and Pittsburgh are so similar on so many levels that “adapting” hasn’t been necessary. It’s more like I’ve just moved to an extremely remote Pittsburgh neighborhood, and now it takes me 4 hours to get to the nearest Crazy Mocha instead of 15 minutes. (Also, people wear a lot more purple here.)
But there are significant differences between the cities, and it’s those “little things” that add up to one big problem: Baltimore has a negative self-image that impacts the way I, a new resident, choose to invest myself (or, more specifically, not invest myself) in my new home.
What Your Labrador Retriever Has to Do with the City’s Murder Rate
The most obvious difference between Pittsburgh and Baltimore is the latter’s epic homicide rate. In 2009, Pittsburgh had 38 homicides (as of December 21), down from 73 in 2008. In the same year, Baltimore had 239, up from 234 in 2008. That’s 6 times as many murders in a city that’s barely double the size of Pittsburgh.
So what makes people kill other people? And why are Baltimoreans so much more likely — or more willing, or more accepting of other people’s homicidal inclinations — to kill each other?
According to at least one analyst, it all boils down to Baltimore’s lack of a shared citywide identity.
The current issue of Baltimore’s Urbanite magazine includes an excerpt from Ohio State history professor Randolph Roth‘s American Homicide, which suggests that murder rates escalate when citizens lose faith in their social and political hierarchies. If we no longer feel like the system we live in is fair, we don’t believe that respecting even the most basic rules will in any way improve our quality of life, so we’re more inclined to institute our own “survival of the fittest” mentality, pursuing what we believe is achievable rather than striving to “succeed” in a corrupt system.
All of which means that solving Baltimore’s homicide problem requires more than “just” tackling the issues of poverty, education or politics. It requires that the people care enough about themselves and their city to redefine their own accessible future, together, and shape new politics and polemics around their own unified identity.
So what does all of this have to do with dog shit?
For Want of a Poop Bag, the Battle Was Lost…
I live in a neighborhood rife with dog owners, including me. I walk my dog at least 5 times a day, and those jaunts give me lots of face time with the area’s sidewalks and tree boxes.
And they are, invariably, covered in shit.
As a random sample, I walked Rufus on Sunday afternoon and counted no fewer than 20 piles of dog shit left along the sidewalk in a 6 block radius. Included among these roadside treats were deposits made in all but one of the tree boxes outside a nearby elementary school. That’s right: out of nearly a dozen tree boxes located at the entrance to a gradeschool, all but one was home to a pile of shit. Not one. Not two. All but one.
It says a lot about the character of a city when its people can’t be bothered to NOT leave steaming piles of dog shit at the doorway to their children’s schools.
Baltimore: Get Your Shit Together
Maybe I’m expecting too much of people. Maybe because I clean up after my dog (and because it’s a law), I presume everyone else is naturally as interested in keeping their own neighborhood aesthetically pleasing (and free of health hazards).
Maybe I’m also being too reductive. Surely a city’s societal woes can’t be encapsulated in the respect it shows to its own streets? Perhaps I should look at other statistics, like Baltimore’s impeccable driving record.
Oh. Never mind.
But don’t worry. I get it. I know life is hard and people are busy. And maybe expecting you to take responsibility for what you do is elitist. There is a recession, after all. If it comes down to affording food or poop bags, I understand that feeding your kids trumps scraping your dog’s shit off your neighbor’s front steps. We all have priorities.
But if you can’t clean up after your dog, don’t own a dog. It’s that simple. It’s about responsibility, accountability, leadership, good stewardship and being an adult. It’s about understanding what you can handle vs. what’s beyond your grasp.
Most importantly, it’s about how you see yourself.
And as long as Baltimore continues to be a city that doesn’t mind being covered in shit, I’ll continue to be a resident who refrains from investing emotionally in a city that refuses to love itself.
Dig this blog? Subscribe and you’ll never miss a witty insight again.
Tags: America, baltimore, ethics, Pittsburgh, Sociology
-
John Boon
-
jonny goldstein
-
Dave Troy
-
Ian M Rountree
-
Justin
-
Dave Troy
-
Ian M Rountree









