Lately, several websites have scraped my blog posts and repurposed my content as their own.  I know I’m not the only person whose blog is being plagiarized in this way.  But I wonder if authors like Chris Brogan, John Moore and Tim Ferriss realize it’s happening to them, too.

Say Hello to Joel Goldstein, Marketing Douchebag

Last week, Chris Brogan wrote The Audacity of Free, a blog post about the flaws in a “freemium” pricing system.  But if you went to Joel Goldstein’s website, you’d think Joel himself wrote that article.  That’s because he scrapes and reposts other people’s blog content as his own.  (In Joel’s defense, this particular post includes the disclaimer “Posts are pulled via RSS feed from writer’s blog.”  But since the name or website of the actual writer isn’t included, logic would lead a visitor to believe the “writer’s blog” being pulled from is Joel’s own.)

Joel Goldstein vs. Chris Brogan

Likewise, Joel’s “Would You Miss Denny’s” think piece is really an uncredited scrape of John Moore’s long-running “Would You Miss [Brand Name]?” theme at Brand Autopsy.  And, unlike the Brogan post above, the Moore piece is reposted without a disclaimer referring to any other writer at all; it’s listed as having been written by “admin”.

Joel Goldstein vs. John Moore

But Wait, It Gets Better…

Unsurprisingly, this isn’t the first time Joel Goldstein has been caught plagiarizing legitimate authors.  Last month, Ajit Verghese noted that the “About the Author” page from the website for Goldstein’s book A Professional’s Guide to Social Media steals not one but two testimonials originally written about Tim Ferriss’s 4-Hour Workweek and attributes the sentiment to Goldstein instead.

At that same time, Peter Kim accused Goldstein of plagiarising one of David Armano’s Logic+Emotion blog posts.  When confronted, Goldstein evidently took down the page on his site that used Armano’s work without attribution.  However, judging by the URL structure of that now-missing page, it matches the structure of the Brogan lift mentioned above, which means it was probably a page created by the same blog scraper.  If Goldstein truly doesn’t think he’s doing anything wrong, as he asserted with Kim, he must also not believe that defending his position is worth the hassle.

Your Work Speaks for Itself

Chris Brogan, John Moore and Tim Ferriss are well-known and respected names in social media.  The relevance of their ideas and influence over thousands of readers is what makes their posts worth stealing.  They don’t have time to hunt down everyone who claims authorship of their ideas because they’re too busy doing actual work.  (Except possibly Ferriss, who’s probably too busy not doing work.  But I digress…)

On the other hand, Joel Goldstein (via his LinkedIn profile) claims to be a specialist in “social media, online branding and internet marketing” despite just joining Twitter in March of 2009 (unless you count his underused personal Twitter profile, which he launched in December of 2008).  Then there’s the matter of his chronically unwatched YouTube channel, and his business website that includes “viral videos” (yes, really) among his services.

Some people work hard to earn their reputations.  Others work hard to steal the reputations of those who’ve earned them.  For hacks like Goldstein to make a living by feasting on the grey areas that surround unlicensed attribution (or outright theft) of other people’s work is deplorable.  And for that, he makes our ever-growing list of Marketing Douchebags.

Share This Post:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • Wow. Thanks for the heads-up Justin. A better title for this guy's book on social media should be: "The Unprofessional Guide to Socially Unacceptable Media Behavior."
  • @shoogie
    Con: Authenticity #fail. Plagiarism. Lack of Moral Character.
    Pro: Kharma. And the fact that he has good taste, stealing from the best! :)

    (Is there not a bio link which doesn't drive his site traffic, like his LinkedIn profile? Why support his increase? Any publicity is probably great publicity in his eyes. . . )
  • Peter: Since he took the page you accused him about down and he hasn't reinstated it yet, I'd say he knows what he's doing and he won't stop until he's either famous or sued.
  • You know, in an effort to be fair, I did call him to speak live and try to get the story straight. I thought maybe he was confused...but it's pretty clear he knows exactly what he's doing.
  • Nice catch, Ike. Doubly so, since eBay was founded in 1995. If someone's going to lie, at least get the facts right.
  • Ike
    Oh, THIS is the part that I can't stop laughing about:

    I have been involved in Internet marketing since 2001 since the start of Ebay.


    Well, I guess that means I can claim to have been involved in communications since 1969 since the Apollo 11 moon landing.
  • CathyD: The post is still there as I type this. Click the "wrote that article" link in the 2nd paragraph above. (The guy runs a lot of websites, and the same info isn't on all of them.)

    Tish: I agree that his persona doesn't add up, and your estimation of why is probably right on the money. Although it's not unreasonable that his email address should do to "Sanju," since he may have a manager. Stating that on the site would make sense, but when so little else does...
  • If you poke around on JG's site, there are a number of things that don't add up: the email addy, for instance, does not even go to him, but to someone named "Sanju" Also check out the YouTube channel. The only video that shows someone who might be "Joel Goldstein" is of a presentation in a place that looks like a movie theater lobby. I also thought it was interesting that, on the description of one of the videos, whomever it is mentions a "Harvard President" If your business has that kind of a connection, you will probably mention that person, as well as mention that someone of that caliber is on your board or an adviser. Too many things don't add up with the guy (or guys) internet persona as is put forth in the website/blog/videos that I tend to think this is a very inexperienced person/persons trying to be at a level he/they haven't earned. (I've been around this stuff for a long time, so I've got a good eye) Sucks though, as there are so many people who really want to know about social media.
  • CathyD
    Looks like he may have removed the post? I just tried searching for "The Audacity of Free" on his website and couldn't find it.

    But to Bill's point, "the only defense..is a good offense". I read Brogan. Never heard of this Joel guy and he's lost all credibility with me now.
  • Yeah.. That's underhanded as well as crazy CORNY! :/

    Unfortunately, that's the world of broadcasting that we live in. As soon as we drop something, people are going to try to take credit for it. I have less of a problem with this because I write about original topics that are also off the beaten path. Nobody can snarf my material and claim that they wrote it themselves because they wouldn't ever be able to support "their own" logic in an IRL conversation.

    Basic marketing concepts are easy to rip-off, though. You say it, it makes sense to someone else, they repost it and try to get Social Media clients based on other people's work. A lot of posts are plagiarized anyway from Twitter & Facebook by way of reading something someone else posted and writing it up in your own words, but that's a different topic altogether.

    The only defense in this situation is a good offense. Staying on top of the game and staying more popular than people that try to bite your style and get paid from it is what makes people check your site out FIRST and theirs later.

    hahaha Maybe the FTC will come up with some new rules for THIS as well so we can charge people for using our posts to drum up business for themselves! :D
  • Well done and fair play for you for taking the time and effort to research this properly and share. Douchebag is indeed the correct word to use for somebody like this. The only good news is that he won't make it for long. People always see through this sort of stuff in the end.
  • KathleenLD
    That's so depressing. I just don't understand people like that.
blog comments powered by Disqus